Manual Statistics Made Learnable — A Learning Aid for Statistics Courses

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Statistics Made Learnable — A Learning Aid for Statistics Courses file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Statistics Made Learnable — A Learning Aid for Statistics Courses book. Happy reading Statistics Made Learnable — A Learning Aid for Statistics Courses Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Statistics Made Learnable — A Learning Aid for Statistics Courses at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Statistics Made Learnable — A Learning Aid for Statistics Courses Pocket Guide.

PediaPhon Learning during jogging and driving! E-learning and m-learning with MP3 players and mobile phones! A podcast and a winamp play list will be generated too. MP3 files, play lists and podcast automatically generated from Wikipedia! Let your computer read out the Wikipedia for you! PowerTalk PowerTalk is a free program that automatically speaks any presentation or slide show running in Microsoft PowerPoint for Windows. You just download and install PowerTalk and while you open and run the presentation as usual it speaks the text on your slides.

The advantage over other generic 'Text To Speech' programs is that PowerTalk is able to speak text as it appears and can also speak hidden text attached to images. Select and SpeakSelect and Speak uses iSpeech's human sounding text to speech TTS to let you select text from almost any website and make it talk. Select text you want to read and listen to it.

SpeakIt converts text into speech so you no longer need to read. SpeakIt reads selected text using Text-to-Speech technology with language auto-detection. It can read text in more than 50 languages. SpokenTextSpokenText lets you easily convert text into speech. Download your recordings as. Select text, click the button on the bottom right of Firefox window and this add-on speaks the selected text for you. Isn't it brilliant? Audio is downloadable. Just enter your text, select one of the voices and download the resulting mp3 file to your computer.

This service is free and you are allowed to use the speech files for any purpose, including commercial uses. Voki Voki is a FREE service that lets you create customized avatars, add voice to your Voki avatars, post your Voki to any blog, website, or profile, and take advantage of Voki's learning resources.

It will speak the text of the document and will highlight it as it goes. It contains a talking dictionary and a text-to-mp3 converter. Enhance your digital classroom with Animoto, an ideal tool for creating videos and presentations. It takes just minutes to create a video which can bring your lessons to life. Educators can apply for a free Animoto Plus account for use in the classroom. Its powerful features can be used to create stunning presentations incorporating images, video clips, music and text. BubblrBubblr is a tool to create comic strips using photos from flickr.

Capzles All of your media, your life, your stories together like never before. Create rich multimedia experiences with videos, photos, music, blogs and documents. Cartoonist Cartoonists is an online tool to create cartoons or personal digital stories, consisting of professional backgrounds, characters, props, images and text. With Cartoonist, you can create multimedia stories. You can use the tool to create comic strips or more personal digital narratives.

Comic MasterComic Master allow you to create your own short graphic novel. With Comic Master you can decide how you want the page or your graphic novel to look, to add backgrounds, choose characters and props to appear in your scenes, to add dialogue and captions, and much more Domo animate Import your pictures, select a nice song to accompany the slideshow and you are done! Your pictures will be the hero of your own personalized Domo adventure. You can create your own Domo adventures in minutes with their easy-to-use animation studio. Generator Generator is a creative studio space, a space where you can explore the moving image, be inspired, create your own moving image works and share your creations with the Generator community.

Gain a deeper understanding of the context of these inspiring stories through their Education Themes section. You have to choose a character and emotion. Then you have to add talk or thought balloons and start your character talking. You can add other characters and more conversation. Also, you can add colored backgrounds, objects and panel prompts to keep your viewers interested. Least but not last, you can continue to edit and make more changes, and when you are done you can print or email your comic! MapSkip The purpose of MapSkip.

Users are invited to create a free account and to mark up places in Google Maps with their own stories and photos. Users can browse each other's stories and can rate and discuss them. MapSkip is free to use and free of ads. PicLits PicLits. The object is to put the right words in the right place and the right order to capture the essence, story, and meaning of the picture.

Pixton Pixton empowers the world to communicate graphically with comics. From fully posable characters to dynamic panels, props, and speech bubbles, every aspect of a comic can be controlled in an intuitive click-n-drag motion. Pixton is free for fun but has paid version for Schools and Businesses.

Slidestory Combine sharing pictures and narration and what do you get? Smilebox Smilebox lets you quickly and easily create slideshows, invitations, greetings, collages, scrapbooks and photo albums right on your computer. To get started, download and install the Smilebox application. Then simply, select the photos you want to use, choose a template add comments and music and voila, you've made a Smilebox! With more than customizable templates to choose from, you'll find inspiration around every corner. The idea behind Smories is to publishes stories for kids read by kids.

Also, you will find a lot of stories in various subjects submitted by teachers and authors. Storybird Storybird lets anyone make visual stories in seconds. They curate artwork from illustrators and animators around the world and inspire writers of any age to turn those images into fresh stories.

Zimmer TwinsThe Zimmer Twins is a site devoted to kids and creative storytelling. Since , the Zimmer Twins has invited children to create and share their own animated stories. ZooBurstZooBurst is a digital storytelling tool that lets anyone easily create his or her own 3D pop-up books. Using ZooBurst, storytellers of any age can create their own rich worlds in which their stories can come to life. Authors can arrange characters and props within a 3D world that can be customized using uploaded artwork or items found in a built-in database of over 10, free images and materials.

Free apps for digital storytelling Puppet Pals Create your own unique shows with animation and audio in real time! Simply pick out your actors and backdrops, drag them on to the stage, and tap record. Your movements and audio will be recorded in real time for playback later. This app is as fun as your own creativity.

Act out a story of Pirates on the high seas, fight as scary monsters, or play the part of a Wild West bandit on the loose. You can even combine any characters however you want! ShowMe allows you to record voice-over whiteboard tutorials and share them online. Add Puppets, props, scenery, and backgrounds and start creating. Hit the record button and the puppets automatically lip-synch to your voice.

Toontastic: FREEToontastic is a storytelling and creative learning tool that enables kids to draw, animate, and share their own cartoons with friends and family around the world through simple and fun imaginative play! With over 2 million cartoons created in over countries, parents and teachers rave about the app AudacityAudacity is free, open source, cross-platform software for recording and editing sounds. BlogAmpBlogamp is a web-based audiocasting solution that combines a rich media on-demand experience with podcasting.

Blogamp's robust administration utility and content manager allows site owners and bloggers the ability to customize the on demand presentation as well as utilize the many add-on features depending on who the target audience is. EasypodcastEasypodcast is a GUI tool for easy podcast publication. Easypodcast is multi-language english and spanish and cross-platform: tested on Windows and Linux kde.

This is possible thanks to wxPython. HuffDuffer Create your own podcast. Find links to audio files on the Web. Huffduff the links—add them to your podcast. Subscribe to podcasts of other found sounds. Podbean Podbean. Easy to publish your podcast in 3 steps. No tech to learn. Powerful promoting tools, iTunes Preview, Statistics. Wonderful income chances with ads, paid subscriptions. PodOmatic Record video and audio podcasts. Receive in-line calls from listeners. SoundCloud Share Your Sounds. Everyone has sounds to share.

Now you can share yours. Publish to social networks or embed your sounds on your site. TalkShoe Create, schedule and run a live show.

Connect, Compare, and Contrast

Integrate the recording on your website. VozMe Convert text to MP3. Upload documents, cut and paste text or link to feeds. Text reader converts text to speech automatically. Find out why we're the greatest online survey and poll software in the world with integrated form builder. AnswerGarden AnswerGarden is a new minimalistic feedback tool. Use it as a tool for online brainstorming or embed it on your website or blog as a poll or guestbook. Boo rooCreate online polls in minutes with our free polling tool. Use our comprehensive poll builder in order to create beautiful polling solutions in your browser, for free.

Doculicious Easily create embeddable web forms that generate PDF documents. Get started in seconds! Forms on the Fly Amazing online forms made simple. Once you begin collecting results, we provide the functionality to email, analyze, share, and download your data. Formspring Formspring is the place where you can share your perspective on anything. Members express their point of view and personality through engaging conversations and interact with friends, followers, and people they just find cool.

FoSpace The ability to publish self-calculating order forms, online surveys, contact forms, employment applications, rental applications or any type of online form imaginable, without having to hire a programmer, has finally been realized. Over 1 million users! Then check out the results, neatly organized in a spreadsheet.

Kwik SurveysKwik Surveys makes your job easy. Design surveys,forms, polls and feedback forms. It's free! MySurveyLab Professional online surveys. Fastest online survey tool on the market. Beautiful yet simple color themes. Orbeon Forms Orbeon Forms is your solution to build and deploy web forms. It handles complex forms typical of the enterprise or government, implements the W3C XForms standard, and is available in a free open source Community Edition, as well as a commercially supported Professional Edition.

PollDaddy The most powerful and easy-to-use survey software around. Create stunning surveys, polls, and quizzes in minutes. Collect responses via your website, e-mail, iPad, Facebook, and Twitter. Generate and share easy-to-read reports. Pollhost In a hurry? Create a free poll as a guest at Pollcode. No need to sign up, quick free and easy!

ScattervoxScattervox is a new kind of poll! When you create a poll, you ask users to show how they feel about different people, places, or things by plotting them on a two-dimensional graph. It's like an interactive infographic! With SiS Survey you can now create surveys and polls for your website, blog and social network profiles.

SonarIf you need to feel the pulse of your community, or to get feedback on anything, SonarHQ is the easy and cost-effective way to get answers to your questions. The smarter, faster and easier way to create surveys. SurveyMonkey SurveyMonkey is the world's most popular online survey tool. It's easier than ever to send free surveys, polls, questionnaires, customer feedback and market research.

Plus get access to survey questions and professional templates. Surveys Engine Surveys Engine is lightwheight online surveys server software. This tool enables you create various surveys and questionaires, from small and simple to large and complex. Surveys are hosted in our site so you and survey respondents don't need any software or server, just Internet browser. Survs Create online surveys with simplicity and elegance. Survs lets you create, distribute, and analyze online surveys and questionnaires with a friendly interface and powerful features.

Survs gives you everything you need to gather feedback. Vizzual Forms Vizzualforms is a web based service that will let you create forms and surveys, publish them online and see the results! Web Form Factory Web Form Factory is an open source web form generator which automatically generates the necessary backend code to tie your form to a database. By generating the backend code for you, WFF saves you time Web Online Surveys Create questionnaires with point and click ease. This is an all in one service designed for people who are not computer experts and have the need to conduct surveys by themselves.

Wufoo Wufoo is a web application that helps anybody build amazing online forms. When you design a form with Wufoo, it automatically builds the database, backend and scripts needed to make collecting and understanding your data easy, fast and fun. Customize with our code generator and integrate within minutes! Media creation tools: image editor, audio editor, screen capture. Clip2Net This free service allows you to upload desktop area image or files on the web really fast such as Desktop area capture and upload, Video capture and upload, Upload image from Clipboard, Upload text documents and much more.

It also allows you to record screen activities and sound into video files. Greenshot is a light-weight screenshot software tool for Windows with key features such as quickly creating screenshots of a selected region, window or fullscreen; capturing of complete scrolling web pages from Internet Explorer, easily annotating, highlighting or obfuscating parts of the screenshot and much more. Create images and videos of what you see on your computer screen, then share them instantly!

KingKong Capture Capture onscreen images fast and easy. Quick capture of your desktop, selected areas and objects. Easy printing of screenshots. Automatic saving in various supported graphic file formats are some of the key features of KingKong Capture. To use this service, all you need is to add our bookmarklet to your favorite browser. Takes a screenshot, cut out an aread, and then embed it anywhere that you want. PrtScr Screen capture tool. Captures full screen, rectangle selection, freehand selection, or active window. Can capture mouse cursor.

Supports multiple monitors. Much better than Microsoft's own Snipping Tool. Screenshots are a great way to show your desktop setup to friends and colleagues. But why settle for thumbnail of your carefully constructed desktop? Get classy - use Rumshot to automatically generate a themed and stylish screenshot preview! ScreenDash Capture images from your computer screen with ease. If you can see it on-screen, you can capture it, including web-pages, PDF files, programs, etc.

Screenhunter Award-winning screen capture solution to capture your screen, print and edit. Also with auto-scroll web pages, auto-capture, webcam and video screen capture. Screenpresso Screenpresso captures your screen screenshots and HD videos for your training documents, collaborative design work, IT bug reports, and more Screenshot Captor Screenshot Captor is a best-in-class tool for grabbing, manipulating, annotating, and sharing screenshots.

It's different from other screenshot utilities in several notable ways such as optimized for taking lots of screenshots with minimal intervention; highly configurable to make it work the way you want it to but stays out of your way in the system tray, excellent multi-monitor support, full set of scanner acquisition tools and scanner image correction, and perfect capture of Windows 7 partial transparency effects. ScreenSnaprScreenSnapr's aim is to provide a simple and straight-forward approach to image capturing and sharing.

Without any of the extra fluff, ScreenSnapr makes sharing images as easy as possible. Press the shortcut and go! SkitchAnnotate, edit and share your screenshots and images Download now, it's free! Get your point across with fewer words using annotation, shapes and sketches, so that your ideas become reality faster. TinyGrab:Social Screenshot sharing.

Take a screenshot and share it with your clients or friends in less time than it took you to read this sentence! TinyGrab 2. Taking the critically acclaimed original TinyGrab and building on it. Websnapr websnapr lets you capture screenshots of almost any web page. Allow your visitors to instantly visualize any web page before clicking.

Increase site traffic, click-through rate and site stickiness. The HTML5 output offers the multi-device support, thereby, enabling learners to seamlessly move across devices as they complete a given course. However, the User Experience and interactions are largely aligned with the way learners consume content on desktops and laptops. As a result, this kind of a learning experience would work reasonably well on tablets. However, the approach has its limitations on smartphones on two counts:. In contrast to the adaptive mobile-friendly designs , responsive mobile-first designs should be used when the predominant consumption of content is expected to be on smartphones.

A responsive or a mobile-first, design-based approach is fully optimized for smartphones, and it can also be used on tablets and laptops or desktops. The highlights of this approach are as follows. You will notice that they fully offset the limitations of adaptive mobile-friendly designs.

This can offer a higher visual experience and custom interactions. This can be used to create both responsive mobile-first or adaptive mobile-friendly eLearning designs. Use this opportunity to create a higher learnability in the new HTML5 courses. These include strategies that work well on mobile devices. For instance, you can opt for microlearning and social learning, and see the impact on learners soar.

321 Free Tools for Teachers - Free Educational Technology

More broadly, asking at what point new neurobiological knowledge is arising during ClSt and StLe investigations relies on largely distinct theoretical frameworks that revolve around null-hypothesis testing and statistical learning theory Figure 4. Both ClSt and StLe methods share the common goal of demonstrating relevance of a given effect in the data beyond the sample brain scans at hand. However, the attempt to show successful extrapolation of a statistical relationship at the general population is embedded in different mathematical contexts.

Knowledge generation in ClSt and StLe is hence rooted in different notions of statistical inference. Figure 4. Key concepts in classical statistics and statistical learning. Schematic with statistical notions that are relatively more associated with classical statistical methods left column or pattern-learning methods right column. As there is a smooth transition between the classical statistical toolkit and learning algorithms, some notions may be closely associated with both statistical cultures middle column.

The rationale behind hypothesis falsification is that one counterexample can reject a theory by deductive reasoning , while any quantity of evidence can not confirm a given theory by inductive reasoning Goodman, The investigator verbalizes two mutually exclusive hypotheses by domain-informed judgment. The alternative hypothesis should be conceived as the outcome intended by the investigator and to contradict the state of the art of the research topic.

The null hypothesis represents the devil's advocate argument that the investigator wants to reject i. If the null hypothesis can not be rejected which depends on power , then the test yields no conclusive result, rather than a null result Schmidt, In this way, classical hypothesis testing continuously replaces currently embraced hypotheses explaining a phenomenon in nature by better hypotheses with more empirical support in a Darwinian selection process.

Finally, Fisher, Neyman, and Pearson intended hypothesis testing as a marker for further investigation, rather than an off-the-shelf decision-making instrument Cohen, ; Nuzzo, In StLe instead, answers to how neurobiological conclusions can be drawn from a dataset at hand are provided by the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimensions VC dimensions from statistical learning theory Vapnik, , The VC dimensions of a pattern-learning algorithm quantify the probability at which the distinction between the neural correlates underlying the face vs.

Such statistical approaches implement the inductive strategy to learn general principles i. Tenenbaum et al. VC dimensions are derived from the maximal number of different brain scans that can be correctly detected to belong to either the house condition or the face condition by a given model. The VC dimensions thus provide a theoretical guideline for the largest set of brain scan examples fed into a learning algorithm such that this model is able to guarantee zero classification errors.

As one of the most important results from statistical learning theory, in any intelligent learning system, the opportunity to derive abstract patterns in the world by reducing the discrepancy between prediction error from training data in-sample estimate and prediction error from independent test data out-of-sample estimate decreases with the higher model capacity and increases with the number of available training observations Vapnik and Kotz, ; Vapnik, In brain imaging, a learning algorithm is hence theoretically backed up to successfully predict outcomes in future brain scans with high probability if the choosen model ignores structure that is overly complicated, such as higher-order non-linearities between many brain voxels, and if the model is provided with a sufficient number of training brain scans.

Hence, VC dimensions provide explanations why increasing the number of considered brain voxels as input features i. Nevertheless, the VC dimensions provide justification that a certain learning model can be used to approximate that target function by fitting a model to a collection of input-output pairs. In short, VC dimensions is among the best frameworks to derive theoretical errors bounds for predictive models Abu-Mostafa et al. Further, some common invalidations of the ClSt and StLe statistical concern in neuroimaging studies performing classical inference is double dipping or circular analysis Kriegeskorte et al.

This occurs when, for instance, first correlating a behavioral measure with brain activity and then using the identified subset of brain voxels for a second correlation analysis with that same behavioral measurement Lieberman et al. In this scenario, voxels are submitted to two statistical tests with the same goal in a nested, non-independent fashion 5 Freedman, This corrupts the validity of the null hypothesis on which the reported test results conditionally depend.

Importantly, this case of repeating a same statistical estimation with iteratively pruned data selections on the training data split is a valid routine in the StLe framework, such as in recursive feature extraction Guyon et al. However, double-dipping or circular analysis in ClSt applications to neuroimaging data have an analog in StLe analyses aiming at out-of-sample generalization: data-snooping or peeking Pereira et al.

This can occur, for instance, when performing simple e. Data-snooping can lead to overly optimistic cross-validation estimates and a trained learning algorithm that fails on fresh data drawn from the same distribution Abu-Mostafa et al. Rather than a corrupted null hypothesis, it is the error bounds of the VC dimensions that are loosened and, ultimately, invalidated because information from the concealed test set influences model selection on the training set.

In sum, statistical inference in ClSt is drawn by using the entire data at hand to formally test for theoretically guaranteed extrapolation of an effect to the general population. In stark contrast, inferential conclusions in StLe are typically drawn by fitting a model on a larger part of the data at hand i. As such, ClSt has a focus on in-sample estimates and explained-variance metrics that measure some form of goodness of fit, while StLe has a focus on out-of-sample estimates and prediction accuracy. Vignette: After isolating the neural correlates underlying face processing, the neuroimaging investigator wants to examine their relevance in psychiatric disease.

In addition to the 40 healthy participants, 40 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia are recruited and administered the same experimental paradigm and set of face and house pictures.

Statistics full Course for Beginner - Statistics for Data Science

In this clinical fMRI study on group differences, the investigator wants to explore possible imaging-derived markers that index deficits in social-affective processing in patients carrying a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Question: Can metrics of statistical relevance from ClSt and StLe be combined to corroborate a given candidate biomarker? Many neuroscientists have thus adopted a natural habit of assessing the quality of statistical relationships by means of p -values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and statistical power.

These are ubiquitously taught and used at many universities, although they are not the only coherent set of statistical diagnostics Figure 5. These outcome metrics from ClSt may for instance be less familiar to some scientists with a background in computer science, physics, engineering, or philosophy. As an equally legitimate and internally coherent, yet less widely known diagnostic toolkit from the StLe community, prediction accuracy, precision, recall, confusion matrices, F1 score, and learning curves can also be used to measure the relevance of statistical relationships Abu-Mostafa et al.

Figure 5. Key differences between measuring outcomes in classical statistics and statistical learning. Ten intuitions on quantifying statistical modeling outcomes that tend to be relatively more true for classical statistical methods blue or pattern-learning methods red. ClSt typically yields point estimates and interval estimates e. In many cases, classical inference is a judgment about an entire data sample, whereas a trained predictive model can obtain quantitative answers from a single data point. On a general basis, applications of ClSt and StLe methods may not judge findings on identical grounds Breiman, ; Shmueli, ; Lo et al.

There is an often-overlooked misconception that models with high explanatory performance do necessarily exhibit high predictive performance Wu et al. For instance, brain voxels in ventral visual stream found to well explain the difference between face processing in healthy and schizophrenic participants based on an ANOVA may not in all cases be the best brain features to train a support vector machine to predict this group effect in new participants. An important outcome measure in ClSt is the quantified significance associated with a statistical relationship between few variables given a pre-specified model.

ClSt tends to test for a particular structure in the brain data based on analytical guarantees , in form of as mathematical convergence theorems about approximating the population properties with increasing sample size. The outcome measure for StLe is the quantified generalization of patterns between many variables or, more generally, the robustness of special structure in the data Hastie et al. In the neuroimaging literature, reports of statistical outcomes have previously been noted to confuse diagnostic measures from classical statistics and statistical learning Friston, For neuroscientists adopting a ClSt culture computing p -values takes a central position.

The p-value denotes the probability of observing a result at least as extreme as a test statistic, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Under the condition of sufficiently high power cf. Counterintuitively, it is not an immediate judgment on the alternative hypothesis H 1 preferred by the investigator Cohen, ; Anderson et al. P -values do also not qualify the possibility of replication. It is another important caveat that a finding in the brain becomes more statistically significant i.

The essentially binary p -value i. The effect size allows the identification of marginal effects that pass the statistical significance threshold but are not practically relevant in the real world. The p -value is a deductive inferential measure, whereas the effect size is a descriptive measure that follows neither inductive nor deductive reasoning. The normalized effect size can be viewed as the strength of a statistical relationship—how much H 0 deviates from H 1 , or the likely presence of an effect in the general population Chow, ; Ferguson, ; Kelley and Preacher, This diagnostic measure is often unit-free, sample-size independent, and typically standardized.

As a property of the actual statistical test, the effect size can be essential to report for biological understanding, but has different names and takes various forms, such as rho in Pearson correlation, eta 2 in explained variances, and Cohen's d in differences between group averages. Additionally, the certainty of a point estimate i. These variability diagnostics indicate a range of values between which the true value will fall a given proportion of the time Estes, ; Nickerson, ; Cumming, The tighter the confidence interval, the smaller the variance of the point estimate of the population parameter in each drawn sample.

The estimation of confidence intervals is influenced by sample size and population variability. Confidence intervals may be asymmetrical ignored by Gaussianity assumptions; Efron, , can be reported for different statistics and with different percentage borders. Notably, they can be used as a viable surrogate for formal tests of statistical significance in many scenarios Cumming, Some confidence intervals can be computed in various data scenarios and statistical regimes, whereas the power may be especially meaningful within the culture of classical hypothesis testing Cohen, , ; Oakes, To estimate power the investigator needs to specify the true effect size and variance under H 1.

The ClSt-minded investigator can then estimate the probability for rejecting null hypotheses that should be rejected, at the given threshold alpha and given that H 1 is true. A high power thus ensures that statistically significant and non-significant tests indeed reflect a property of the population Chow, Intuitively, a small confidence interval around a relevant effect suggests high statistical power.

False negatives i. Ioannidis, Concretely, an underpowered investigation means that the investigator is less likely to be able to distinguish between H 0 and H 1 at the specified significance threshold alpha. Power calculations depend on several factors, including significance threshold alpha, the effect size in the population, variation in the population, sample size n , and experimental design Cohen, While neuroimaging studies based on classical statistical inference ubiquitously report p -values and confidence intervals, there have however been few reports of effect size in the neuroimaging literature Kriegeskorte et al.

Effect sizes are however necessary to compute power estimates. This explains the even rarer occurrence of power calculations in the neuroimaging literature Yarkoni and Braver, ; but see Poldrack et al. Given the importance of p -values and effect sizes, the goal of computing both these useful statistics, such as for group differences in the neural processing of face stimuli, can be achieved based on two independent samples of these experimental data especially if some selection process has been used. One sample would be used to perform statistical inference on the neural activity change yielding a p -value and one sample to obtain unbiased effect sizes.

Further, it has been previously emphasized Friston, that p -values and effect sizes reflect in-sample estimates in a retrospective inference regime ClSt. These metrics find an analog in out-of-sample estimates issued from cross-validation in a prospective prediction regime StLe. Instead, classification accuracy on fresh data is a frequently reported performance metric in neuroimaging studies using learning algorithms.

The classification accuracy is a simple summary statistic that captures the fraction of correct prediction instances among all performed applications of a fitted model. Basing interpretation on accuracy alone can be an insufficient diagnostic because it is frequently influenced by the number of samples, the local characteristics of hemodynamic responses, efficiency of experimental design, data folding into train and test sets, and differences in the feature number p Haynes, A potentially under-exploited data-driven tool in this context is bootstrapping.

The archetypical example of computer-intensive statistical method enables population-level inference of unknown distributions largely independent of model complexity by repeated random draws from the neuroimaging data sample at hand Efron, ; Efron and Tibshirani, This opportunity to equip various point estimates by an interval estimate of certainty e. Besides providing confidence intervals, bootstrapping can also perform non-parametric null hypothesis testing. This may be one of few examples of a direct connection between ClSt and StLe methodology.

Alternatively, binomial tests have been used to obtain a p -value estimate of statistical significance from accuracies and other performance scores Pereira et al. It has frequently been employed to reject the null hypothesis that two categories occur equally often. There are however increasing concerns about the validity of this approach if statistical independence between the performance estimates e.

Yet another option to derive p -values from classification performances of two groups is label permutation based on non-parametric resampling procedures Nichols and Holmes, ; Golland and Fischl, This algorithmic significance-testing tool can serve to reject the null hypothesis that the neuroimaging data do not contain relevant information about the group labels in many complex data analysis settings. The neuroscientist who adopted a StLe culture is in the habit of corroborating prediction accuracies using cross-validation: the de facto standard to obtain an unbiased estimate of a model's capacity to generalize beyond the brain scans at hand Hastie et al.

Model assessment is commonly done by training on a bigger subset of the available data i. Cross-validation typically divides the sample into data splits such that the class label i. The pairs of model-predicted label and the corresponding true label for each data point i. Accuracy and the other performance metrics are often computed separately on the training set and the test set.

Additionally, the measures from training and testing can be expressed by their inverse e. The classification accuracy can be further decomposed into group-wise metrics based on the so-called confusion matrix , the juxtaposition of the true and predicted group memberships. The precision measures Table 1 how many of the labels predicted from brain scans are correct, that is, how many participants predicted to belong to a certain class really belong to that class. Put differently, among the participants predicted to suffer from schizophrenia, how many have really been diagnosed with that disease?

On the other hand, the recall measures how many labels are correctly predicted, that is, how many members of a class were predicted to really belong to that class. Hence, among the participants known to be affected by schizophrenia, how many were actually detected as such? Neither accuracy, precision, or recall allow injecting subjective importance into the evaluation process of the learning algorithm.

This disadvantage is addressed by the F beta score : a weighted combination of the precision and recall prediction scores. Concretely, the F 1 score would equally weigh precision and recall of class predictions, while the F 0. Moreover, applications of recall, precision, and F beta scores have been noted to ignore the true negative cases as well as to be highly susceptible to estimator bias Powers, Needless to say, no single outcome metric can be equally optimal in all contexts.

Extending from the setting of healthy-diseased classification to the multi-class setting e. Rather than reporting mere better-than-chance findings in StLe analyses, it becomes more important to evaluate the F 1 , precision and recall scores for each class to be predicted in the brain scans e. In fact, sensitivity equates with recall. Specificity does however not equate with precision. Again, Type I and II errors are related to the entirety of data points in a ClSt regime and prediction is only evaluated on a test data split of the sample in an StLe regime.

Finally, StLe-minded investigators use learning curves Abu-Mostafa et al. For increasingly bigger subsets of the training set, a classification algorithm is trained on that current share of the training set and then evaluated for accuracy on the always-same test set. Across subset instances, simple models display relatively high in-sample error because they can not approximate the target function very well underfitting but exhibit good generalization to unseen data with relatively low out-of-sample error.

Yet, complex models display relatively low in-sample error because they adapt too well to the data overfitting with difficulty to extrapolate to newly sampled data with high out-of-sample error. Put differently, a big gap between high in-sample and low out-of-sample performance is typically observed for high-variance models, such as artificial neural network algorithms or random forests.

These performance metrics from different data splits often converge for high-bias models, such as linear support vector machines and logistic regression. In sum, the ClSt and StLe communities rely on diagnostic metrics that are largely incongruent and may therefore not lend themselves for direct comparison in all practical analysis settings. Vignette: The investigator is interested in potential differences in brain volume that are associated with an individual's age continuous target variable. This L1-penalized residual-sum-of-squares regression performs automatic variable selection i.

Assessing generalization performance of different sparse models using 5-fold cross-validation yields the non-zero coefficients for few brain voxels whose volumetric information is most predictive of an individual's age. Question: How can the investigator perform classical inference to know which of the gray-matter voxels selected to be predictive for biological age are statistically significant?

This is an important concern because most statistical methods currently applied to large datasets perform some explicit or implicit form of variable selection Jenatton et al. There are even many different forms of preliminary selection of variables before performing significance tests on them. Beyond neuroscience, generalization-approved statistical learning models are routinely solving a diverse set of real-world challenges.

This includes algorithmic trading in financial markets, fraud detection in credit card transactions, real-time speech translation, SPAM filtering for e-mails, face recognition in digital cameras, and piloting self-driving cars Jordan and Mitchell, ; LeCun et al. In all these examples, statistical learning algorithms successfully generalize to unseen, later acquired data and thus tackle the problem heuristically without classical significance test on specific variables or for overall model performance.

Second, the LASSO has been introduced as an elegant solution to the combinatorial problem of what subset of gray-matter voxels is sufficient for predicting an individual's age by automatic variable selection Tibshirani, Computing voxel-wise p -values would recast this high-dimensional pattern-learning setting i. Yet, recasting into the mass-univariate setting would ignore the sophisticated selection process that led to the predictive model with a reduced number of variables Wu et al. Put differently, variable selection via the LASSO is itself a stochastic process that is however not accounted for by the theoretical guarantees of classical inference for statistical significance Berk et al.

Put in yet another way, data-driven model selection is corrupting the null hypothesis of classical statistical inference because the sampling distribution of the parameter estimates is altered. Third, the portrayed conflict between more exploratory model selection by cross-validation StLe and more confirmatory classical inference ClSt is currently at the frontier of statistical development Loftus, ; Taylor and Tibshirani, New methods for so-called post-selection inference or selective inference allow computing p -values for a set of features that have previously been chosen to be meaningful predictors by some criterion, one example being sparsity-incuding prediction algorithms such as LASSO.

According to the theory of ClSt, the statistical model is to be chosen before visiting the data. Classical statistical tests and confidence intervals therefore become invalidated and the p -values become optimistically biased Berk et al. Consequently, the association between a predictor and the target variable must be even stronger to certify the same level of significance. As an ordinary null hypothesis can hardly be adopted in this adaptive testing setting, conceptual extension is also prompted on the level of ClSt theory itself Hastie et al.

For instance, closed-form solutions to adjusted classical inference after variable selection already exist for principal component analysis Choi et al. Moreover, a simple alternative to formally account for preceding model selection is data splitting Cox, ; Wasserman and Roeder, ; Fithian et al. In this procedure, the variable selection procedure is computed on one data split and p -values are computed on the remaining second data split.

However, such data splitting is not always possible and will incur power losses. In sum, in many analysis settings, the same data should typically not be used to first apply supervised learning algorithms for automatic selection of the most predictive variables and to then test for statistical significance of the variables already found to be most predictive based on these data points. The recent developments for post-selection inference can be viewed as an attempt to reconcile certain aspects of how the StLe and ClSt paradigms draw conclusions from data.

Login using

Vignette: The investigator is interested in potential brain structure differences that are associated with an individual's gender categorical target variable in the voxel-based morphometry data of the 1,subject HCP release Human Connectome Project; Van Essen et al. To this end, ANOVA univariate test for statistical significance belonging to ClSt is initially used to obtain a ranking of the most relevant 10, features from the gray matter.

Question: Is an analysis pipeline with univariate classical inference and subsequent high-dimensional prediction valid if both steps rely on gender as the target variables? The implications of feature engineering procedures applied before training a learning algorithm is a frequent concern and can require subtle answers Guyon and Elisseeff, ; Kriegeskorte et al. In most applications of predictive models the large majority of brain voxels will not be very informative Brodersen et al. The described scenario of dimensionality reduction by feature selection to focus prediction is clearly allowed under the condition that the ANOVA is not computed on the entire data sample.

Rather, the initial identification of voxels explaining most variance between the male and female individuals should be computed only on the training set in each cross-validation fold. In the training set and test set of each fold the same identified candidate voxels are then regrouped into a feature space that is fed into the support vector machine algorithm. This ensures an identical feature space for model training and model testing but its construction only depends on structural brain scans from the training set. Generally, voxel preprocessing performed before model training is authorized if the feature space construction is not influenced by properties of the concealed test set.

In the present scenario, the Vapnik-Chervonenkis bounds of the cross-validation estimator are therefore not loosened or invalidated if class labels have been exploited for feature selection or depending on whether the feature selection procedure is univariate or multivariate Abu-Mostafa et al. Put differently, the cross-validation procedure simply evaluates the entire prediction process including the automatized and potentially nested dimensionality reduction approaches. In sum, in an StLe regime, using class information during feature preprocessing for a cross-validated supervised estimator is not an instance of data-snooping or peeking if done exclusively on the training set Abu-Mostafa et al.

At the core of this explanation is the goal of cross-validation to yield out-of-sample estimates. In stark contrast, remember that null-hypothesis testing yields in-sample estimates as it needs all available data points to take its decision. Using the class labels for a variable selection step just before null-hypothesis testing on a same data sample would invalidate the null hypothesis Kriegeskorte et al. Consequently, in a ClSt regime, using class information to select variables before null-hypothesis testing will incur an instance of double-dipping or circular analysis.

This also occurs when, for instance, first correlating a behavioral measure with brain activity and then using the identified subset of brain voxels for a second correlation analysis with that same behavioral measurement Lieberman et al. In this scenario, voxels are submitted to two statistical tests with the same goal in a nested, non-independent fashion Freedman, Regarding interpretation of the results, the classifier will miss some brain voxels that only carry relevant information when considered in voxel ensembles.

Univariate feature selection in high-dimensional brain scans may therefore systematically encourage model selection i. Concretely, in the discussed scenario the classifier learns complex patterns between voxels that were previously chosen to be individually important. Remember also that variables that have a statistically significant association with a target variable do not necessarily have good generalization performance , and vice versa Shmueli, ; Lo et al.

On the upside, it is frequently observed that the combination of whole-brain univariate feature selection and linear classification is among the best approaches if the primary goal is maximizing prediction performance as opposed to maximizing interpretability. This allows recasting the StLe regime into a ClSt regime in order to fit a GLM and perform classical statistical tests instead of training a predictive classification algorithm Brodersen et al.

In sum, in many analysis settings, prediction algorithms can be trained after choosing the input variables most significantly associated with an explanatory target variable if the initial classical inference p -values is performed only in the training set and the ensuing evaluation of algorithm generalization prediction performance is performed on the independent test set. Vignette: Each functionally specialized region in the human brain probably has a unique set of long-range connections Passingham et al. This notion has prompted connectivity-based parcellation methods in neuroimaging that segregate an ROI can be locally circumscribed or brain global; Eickhoff et al.

The whole-brain connectivity for each ROI voxel is computed and the voxel-wise connectional fingerprints are submitted to a clustering algorithm i. The investigator wants to apply connectivity-based parcellation to the fusiform gyrus to segregate this ROI into cortical modules that exhibit similar connectivity patterns with the rest of the brain and are, thus potentially, functionally distinct. That is, voxels within the same cluster in the ROI will have more similar whole-brain connectivity properties than voxels from different clusters in the fusiform gyrus.

Question: Is it possible to decide whether the obtained brain clusters are statistically significant? In essence, the aim of connectivity-guided brain parcellation is to find useful, simplified structure by imposing circumscribed compartments on brain topography Yeo et al. This is typically achieved by using k-means, hierarchical, Ward, or spectral clustering algorithms Thirion et al.

Putting on the ClSt hat, an ROI clustering result would be deemed statistically significant if the obtained data are incompatible with the null hypothesis that the investigator seeks to reject Everitt, ; Halkidi et al. Choosing a test statistic for clustering solutions to obtain p -values is difficult Vogelstein et al. Put differently, for classical inference based on statistical hypothesis testing one may need to pick an arbitrary null hypothesis to falsify.

It follows that neither the ClSt notions of effect size and power do seem to apply in the case of brain parcellation also a frequent question by paper reviewers. Instead of classical inference to formally test for a particular structure in the clustering results, the investigator actually needs to resort to exploratory approaches that discover and assess structure in the neuroimaging data Tukey, ; Efron and Tibshirani, ; Hastie et al.

Although statistical methods span a continuum between the two poles of ClSt and StLe, finding a clustering model with the highest fit in the sense of explaining the regional connectivity differences at hand is perhaps more naturally situated in the StLe community. Putting on the StLe hat, the investigator realizes that the problem of brain parcellation constitutes an unsupervised learning setting without any target variable y to predict e.

In clustering analysis, there are many possible transformations, projections, and compressions of X but there is usually no unique criterion of optimality that clearly suggests itself. Evaluating the adequacy of clustering results is therefore conventionally addressed by applying different cluster validity criteria Thirion et al. These heuristic metrics are useful and necessary because clustering algorithms will always find some subregions in the investigator's ROI, that is, find relevant structure with respect to the particular optimization objective of the clustering algorithm whether such structure truly exists in nature or not.

The various clustering validity criteria, possibly based on information theory, topology, or consistency Eickhoff et al. Given that the notions of optimality are not coherent with each other Shalev-Shwartz and Ben-David, ; Thirion et al. Evidently, the discovered set of connectivity-derived clusters only represent hints to candidate brain modules.

Nevertheless, such clustering solutions provide important means to narrow down high-dimensional neuroimaging data. Preliminary clustering results broaden the space of research hypotheses that the investigator can articulate. For instance, unexpected discovery of a candidate brain region cf. Mars et al. Brain parcellation can thus be viewed as an exploratory unsupervised method outlining relevant structure in neuroimaging data that can subsequently be tested as research hypotheses in targeted future neuroimaging studies on classical inference or out-of-sample generalization.

In sum, in most analysis settings, quantifying the importance of clustering solutions is inherently ill-posed because, without an explanatory target variable, many different low-dimensional reexpressions of high-dimensional input data can be useful. Choosing the right variant among the possible dimensionality reductions by clustering algorithms alone can typically not be done based on extrapolation metrics from ClSt p -values, effect size, power or StLe out-of-sample prediction performance, learning curves.

A novel scientific fact about the brain is only valid in the context of the complexity restrictions that have been imposed on the studied phenomenon during the investigation Box, Tools of the imaging neuroscientist's statistical arsenal can be placed on a continuum between classical inference by hypothesis falsification and increasingly used out-of-sample generalization by extrapolating complex patterns to independent data Efron and Hastie, While null-hypothesis testing has been dominating academic milieus in the empirical sciences and statistics departments for several decades, statistical learning methods are perhaps still more prevalent in data-intensive industries Breiman, ; Vanderplas, ; Henke et al.

This sociological segregation may contribute to the existing confusion about the mutual relationship between the ClSt and StLe camps in application domains such as imaging neuroscience. Despite the incongruent historical trajectories and theoretical foundations, both statistical cultures aim at inferential conclusions by extracting new knowledge from data using mathematical models Friston et al.

However, an observed effect in the brain with a statistically significant p -value does not in all cases generalize to future brain recordings Shmueli, ; Arbabshirani et al. Conversely, a neurobiological effect that can be successfully captured by a learning algorithm as evidenced by out-of-sample generalization does not invariably entail a significant p -value when submitted to null-hypothesis testing. The distributional properties of brain data important for high statistical significance and for high prediction accuracy are not identical Efron, ; Lo et al.

The goal and permissible conclusions of a neuroscientific investigation are therefore conditioned by the adopted statistical framework cf. Feyerabend, Awareness of the prediction-inference distinction will be criticial to keep pace with the increasing information detail of neuroimaging data repositories Eickhoff et al.

Ultimately, statistical inference is not a uniquely defined concept. The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication. The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. In the optimization setting of finite spaces, all algorithms searching an extremum perform identically when averaged across possible cost functions. Abu-Mostafa, Y. Learning from Data. Google Scholar. Altman, D. Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 2: predictive values.

BMJ Amunts, K. BigBrain: an ultrahigh-resolution 3D human brain model. Science , — Anderson, D. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Anderson, M. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Brain Sci. Arbabshirani, M. Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: promises and pitfalls.

Learning Charisma

Neuroimage , — Averbeck, B. Neural correlations, population coding and computation. Bach, F.


  • Der Reichstagsbrand und seine Folgen (German Edition).
  • Flaws of the NKJV.
  • Lacan at the Scene (Short Circuits).
  • The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning - Europe PMC Article - Europe PMC.
  • The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning?
  • Mated To The Alpha (BBW Paranormal Erotic Romance – Alpha Mate)?

Breaking the curse of dimensionality with convex neural networks. Behrens, T. Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Bellec, P. Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 51, — Bellman, R. Bengio, Y. Kowaliw, N. Bredeche, and R. Doursat Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer , — Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Berk, R. Valid post-selection inference. Berkson, J.

Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chi-square test. Bishop, C. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Heidelberg: Springer. Generative or discriminative?

Bayesian Stat. Blei, D. Science and data science. Box, G. Science and statistics. Breiman, L. Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Brodersen, K. Oxford: The New Collection. Variational Bayesian mixed-effects inference for classification studies. Neuroimage 76, — Model-based feature construction for multivariate decoding. Neuroimage 56, — Generative embedding for model-based classification of fMRI data.

PLoS Comput. Burnham, K. P values are only an index to evidence: 20th-vs. Ecology 95, — Bzdok, D. Formal models of the network co-occurrence underlying mental operations. Inference in the age of big data: future perspectives on neuroscience. Casella, G. Statistical Inference. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury. Chamberlin, T. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 15, 92— Chambers, J. Greater or lesser statistics: a choice for future research. Choi, Y. Selecting the number of principal components: estimation of the true rank of a noisy matrix.

Chow, S. Precis of statistical significance: rationale, validity, and utility.